The Ol’Birdie has got it right.

Dickie Bird says the umpires in the Oval Test were wrong to punish Pakistan for ball tampering without ‘concrete evidence’.

[Check out his audio at BBC]

And by jove, he is right. How in the name of hell can an umpire accuse a team when not one camera caught anything wrong happening. Change the ball if you want to but don’t play God mate!!!

Some would say he was impartial – I say he is a moron (if he is not an outright racist). Inzamam is right – in South Asian cricket calling a team a cheat is calling the Whole damn country a cheat. And I don’t think Pakistan is a cheat, inspite of all the times they trashed us. I still remember how all the “Whites” used to call Imran’s teams cheats till they learnt to reverse swing:)

Still I would have said Pakistan was in the wrong to not come out immediately after tea and would have agreed to Inzamam being punished for that – but wait we had a bigger prima donna- Mr Darell Moronic Hair would not budge to get back on the bleeping field.

I hope he does not officte another match – but then again the case has gone in front of the second biggest morons of all times, number one being Sepp Blatter and FIFA, the ICC. God save the game!!!

Related links from BBC:
Inzamam charged in cheating row
Lengthy talks fail to save Test
Day four: How the controversy unfolded
English cricket suffers cash blow
How Hair courts controversy
Jonathan Agnew column

From other sites:
Hussain: I’d have done the same if I had been in Inzy’s shoes
Pakistan insist on their innocence
Pakistan throw tamper tantrum
From celebration to shame at the Oval


One thought on “The Ol’Birdie has got it right.

  1. Kinda feel that the problem for Inzi was that if they took the field without staging something larger than a token (end of the day types) protest, it would be tacitly agreeing to the insinuation that some serious infraction had taken place.

    Conversely, if he doesn’t take the field – protest or not – it’s going to be a forfeiture. Otherwise, to resume the game after all that would mean that any team could sufficiently play cry-baby if anything remotely untoward or unacceptable happened (and I must emphasize Pak was not playing “cry baby” ) and get away with it.

    Poor Inzi.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s